Monday, March 28, 2011

The Second Amendment and the Last Bear Shot in Washington County

An article by John Hayes in yesterday’s Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, “Meet your new neighbors: the bears”, reported that, “The state's black bear population has quadrupled since the early 1980s,” and that there are bears in more than 55 counties in Pennsylvania. I don’t know if this includes Washington County.

I’ve lived in Pittsburgh since 1964, but I’m originally from nearby Washington County. For the first eight years of my life, I lived on a farm that had been owned by my family since the late 1700s. Several years ago, when I was researching our family tree, I found out that one of my ancestors is said to have killed the last bear in Washington County.

James McDowell was born in 1804, and according to family records, “followed farming, stock raising and hunting as an occupation, and was considered in his day a great marksman. ...When about fifteen years of age he, with a flint-lock rifle, went hunting, taking along with him a young fox-hound. Before he was off their own farm, he came up to a black bear. The young hound would not leave him, but with his tail down and bristle's up, kept a sniffing. He finally discovered the bear standing up on its haunches and on firing, the powder flashed in the pan, causing the gun to back fire. In the meantime the bear had got down on all fours and ran about a rod before the gun discharged the ball. This bear was the last one seen in these parts and when dressed the bear weighed 300 pounds. [sic]”

I never liked hunting, but my father John McDowell Jr., was a hunter, so I have some understanding about its appeal. Dad owned two shotguns (12 and 20 gauges) and two rifles (a classic 30 30 Winchester and a 264 magnum with a scope). Dad, however, was a different type of hunter and gunowner – he had a conscience.

Winchester 30 30

Dad never owned a handgun because he thought they were “worthless for hunting and dangerous.” He thought that semi and automatic weapons should only be in the hands of the police or soldiers. He had one cardinal rule when it came to guns: never, never, never point a gun at anyone even if you are 100% absolutely sure that the gun is unloaded.

He never graduated from high school, couldn’t quote the Second Amendment like all the NRA members and gunowners of today, but understood it in a way that these fanatics and indifferent politicians never can.

Friday, March 25, 2011

The Big Fat Tax Lie

Josef Goebbels, the infamous Nazi Party propaganda chief, once said, "Any lie, frequently repeated, will gradually gain acceptance." I see this happening every day, especially when politicians make seemingly common sense statements and the media fail to investigate their validity. Take the health care debate where Republicans have charged that Democratic reforms will lead to death panels. Or how about the charge that Obama wasn’t born in the United States and thus his Presidency is illegitimate? Despite being false, these ideas have gained widespread acceptance.

One of the most widely accepted and destructive of these lies is the belief that Americans, especially the middle class, are overtaxed. It has been repeated ad nauseum over the last decade and has become so widely and fanatically embraced that any candidate who even thinks about raising taxes is committing political suicide. So let’s take a look at it:

The following table [1] compares the percentage of pay after taxes of the US to a number of other developed countries:

Table: AVERAGE PAY AFTER TAXES January 1, 2000
MarriedMarried 2 Children
Country$40K$100K$40K$100K
Canada (Ont)76%64%76%64%
Denmark65%48%65%48%
Germany69%65%80%71%
Italy68%60%69%61%
Japan83%75%83%77%
Netherlands64%59%64%59%
Sweden60%53%60%53%
U.K.76%70%76%70%
U.S.78%74%84%77%

What the table tells us is that on January 1, 2000, Americans were able to keep a larger percentage of their paychecks than any of the other comparable developed countries.

According to Wikipedia, “Tax Freedom Day is the first day of the year in which a nation as a whole has theoretically earned enough income to fund its annual tax burden.” Here in the United States, we’ve actually seen it decrease from May 1st in 2000, the height of the Clinton economic boom, to April 9th in 2010. Around the world, Tax Freedom Day is later. For example, Tax Freedom Day for Spain, the UK, Canada, Germany and France is May 21, 2008; May 30, 2010; June 6, 2009; July 8, 2008; and July 16, 2007, respectively.

Fact: Americans are paying less in taxes today than 10 years ago and less in taxes than other developed countries.

Most Americans would either disagree with these facts or cheer if they agree. Normally, I would be one of the ones cheering if it wasn’t for the downsides and there are a number of serious downsides. The most serious of these are crippling our local municipalities. With less revenue coming in, local municipalities have been forced to make drastic cuts in teachers, police, firefighters, and maintenance workers, with resultant deteriorations in public education, safety, and infrastructure.

In order to rationalize the deterioration in public education and justify tax cuts, parents, public officials, reformers, and reactionaries have made teachers their scapegoats. Teachers are frequently characterized as greedy and inept, supported by unions and out-dated tenure rules. Such criticisms, however, totally ignore the fact that, all things being equal, the most important factor in determining quality education is class size. Study after study has shown this to be true. As Don Iglesias, Superintendent of public schools in San Jose, California, was quoted as saying about teacher lay-offs: “This is not a choice that anybody is making because we think increasing class size is a wonderful thing for our schools. It's a choice because there's ineptitude in terms of our elected officials in Sacramento and their unwillingness to raise taxes.” [2] (Emphasis mine.)

Likewise, police and firefighter layoffs have left us less secure. For example, prosecutors in Camden, New Jersey, recently reported a dramatic rise in violent crime two months after 160 police officers were laid off. Aggravated assaults with firearms jumped 259 percent in January and February compared to last year, and violent crime over all is up 19 percent, the Camden County Prosecutor's Office told the Philadelphia Inquirer. [3]

In the case of maintenance of infrastructure, there other considerations. Postponing repairs not only incurs safety risks, but also increases their costs, because the problems inevitably get worse and because we pay for them with inflated dollars. Repairs that cost $1,000,000 in 2011 dollars might cost $2,000,000 in 2021 dollars.

There are more problems. First, irresponsible tax cuts exacerbate economic problems in a circular way: e.g., cut taxes → less revenue → layoffs → even less revenue → even more layoffs. Second, groups like the Tea Party say that one of their goals is to take back control from the Federal Government by cutting taxes and spending. What they don’t realize is that irresponsible tax cuts actually have the opposite effect. With less revenue coming in, local municipalities and states have had to rely more on money from the Feds. However, when Federal money is available, it always comes with strings attached and results in even more control over local municipalities and states. Lastly, this entrenched belief that Americans are overtaxed leads politicians to be even more dishonest than they usually are, because any hint of raising taxes could result in the death knell of their careers.

Let me make this clear, however: I am not saying that the solution to our economic and budget problems is to irresponsibly raise taxes in the future just as we have irresponsibly cut taxes in the past. What I am saying is that any sincere discussions about budget shortfalls have got to include raising taxes in a responsible way. If it doesn't, it is totally disingenuous, whether coming from the right, left, center, conservatives, liberals, Tea Partiers, rich, middle-class or what have you. The reason for this is that spending cuts will get only you so far, and in order to completely balance budgets, we would have to make so many draconian cuts that even the ultra-conservatives would cry uncle.


Unfortunately, the rich, with the help of their political proxies, have done such a thorough job of brainwashing Americans into believing that we are overtaxed as to take it completely off the table. So when any of those “inept elected officials” whom Superintendent Iglesias alluded to, suggests cutting taxes, even the people who would be hurt the most support it. As long as we Americans keep blindly accepting statements that are put forward by the short-sighted, statements such as “Americans are overtaxed,” and “AIG and other financial institutions are too big to fail,” we will keep shooting ourselves in the foot. As a wry poker player once quipped about continually calling with the worst hand, “First you shoot yourself in the left foot, then you shoot yourself in the right foot, and then you blow your head off.”

1. Adams, Cecil, “Are U.S. taxes low compared to the rest of the industrialized world?”, December 1, 2000, The Straight Dope.
2. Montgomery, Michael, “Class Sizes Begin to Rise Again in California Schools”, November 19, 2009, The California Report.
3. Goodwin, Liz, “Violent crime spikes after Camden halves police force”, March 7, 2011, The Lookout.